kirklanda的部落格

The Major News Media missed writing a breakthrough cure for the blocking of malignant neoplasm. Why? Is it because this discovery isn't a tablets but a spartan affordable multivitamin beside folic blistering that can disqualify cancers up to 50%? If it were a pharmaceutic that achieved specified unbelievable grades it would be in all the info reports on telecasting and newspapers. Is it because here is a unfairness hostile vitamins and biological process which are non-drug treatments or because there is no pro for Big Pharma?

The newspaper headline in the New York Times, LA Times, etc and the sound-bite on the CBS, ABC, NBC, FOX day report should have read:

New Major Cancer Protective Treatment - A New Breakthrough 'Drug' That Prevents Cancers in Children -
Unfortunately it didn't. I Googled this study from the February 21, 2007, medical log Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics and nada! The stellar communication outlets in Canada carried it but not in the Good Ole' USA unless you consider the Redding News.

"This is virtually too unadorned an theory for general public to proceeds seriously, but they should clutch it seriously," aforesaid Dr. Gideon Koren, manager of the Motherisk program at the Hospital for Sick Children in Toronto. Globe and Mail.

Vitamin Prevention Worth A Pound Of Cancer Cure

Of educational activity the physical rationale this 'breakthrough' numbers wasn't reportable on in the MNM (Major News Media) was because it wasn't a Pharmaceutical (with central promotion dollars on the dash for MNM) but a undemanding cheap once a day multivitamin pill with folic sulfurous.

"Simply fetching multivitamins and folic sulphurous during gestation can help out a female parent lessen her baby's peril of nascent the maximum customary early life cancers by almost 50 per cent, a new inspection from Toronto's Hospital for Sick Children says." Toronto Star

"The startling discovery that a cut-rate adjunct purchased at a shop can preclude malignant tumor as okay as a extent of first defects adds weight to the proposal that micronutrients have womb-to-tomb welfare benefits for the underdeveloped foetus." Globe and Mail.

Unfounded Bias Against Vitamin Supplements

Maybe the MNM didn't choose up the legend because of a preconception in opposition vitamins from supposed aliment experts resembling Rory Collins, Professor of Medicine and Epidemiology at Oxford University who was reported as truism. -

"It has been aforesaid that Americans have the richest urine in the world, because they munch a lot of high-ticket vitamins and consequently retributive pee them out...There is no fitting corroboration that any nourishment supplements are strong. So if you are active to fritter away your burial on these on trial vitamins, you may as very well misuse less coinage on the cheaper ones." As reported in the daily - The Independent (London), Feb 9, 2004 by Catherine Nixey.

Or perchance - the New York Times article (April 29, 2003) judgement that "multivitamins have not been shown to bar any illness and that it is easy to arrive at utmost adequate doses of clear in your mind vitamins and minerals to if truth be told enlargement the hazard of disease"

For if physicians and the communication media can't be trustworthy to get even the grassroots checkable facts letter-perfect just about vitamins, why should any of their opinions be understood seriously? A cursory stare at the scientific learned profession writing reveals the fallacious info from these two sources.

Medicine Acknowledges Vitamin Supplements- the 'Checkable Facts'

The Journal of the American Medical Association in 2002 reversed its liberal arts anti-vitamin proposal by acknowledging that "it appears careful for all adults to steal aliment supplements"

In 1998 an Editorial in the New England Journal of Medicine was titled: "Eat Right and Take a Multivitamin."

Harvard Public Health - "Today, though, there's not bad evidence that winning a daily multivitamin makes be aware of for record adults...(and) may forestall intuition disease, cancer, osteoporosis, and other prolonged diseases."

A Summary of a few of the Positive Vitamin Studies

The Nurses' Health Study of ended 87,000 women showed that the - "Long-term use of multivitamins may considerably drain hazard for colon cancer." Annals of Internal Medicine 1998.

A 19,000 diligent den found Vitamin C down the "mortality (death-rate) from all-causes..." Lancet (2001)

A pooling of the facts from various studies "concluded...that 1,000 IU of oral nourishment D per day is associated next to a 50% price cut in body part metastatic tumor relative frequency." Recent Results in Cancer Research (2007)

If one was to read these studies one would reason out that supplements have a office to pirouette in hindrance of sickness. Of instruction if one was to disregard these studies and or stare for destructive incorrectly through studies one could possibly establish cynical grades by discriminating research to scaremonger, which is a prevailing maneuver of Big Pharma, MNM and the Medical Establishment.

Vitamins Cost Savings to the System

Taking a multivitamin pill for at least 11 old age would recoup the group $58.1 cardinal as reported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) State-of-the-Science Conference on Multivitamin/Mineral Supplements and Chronic Disease Prevention. May 15-17, 2006

So there's the crux of the matter, nest egg of trillions of dollars to the set of contacts which would generally be shared by the Medical Establishment, Big Pharma and the Major News Media. With a surrounding to 50% curb for whatever cancers, an reduced multivitamin doesn't have decent net profit to go circa. Now you know why the 'Sounds of Silence Were Deafening for the Cancer Cure.'